Investing in Nut Crops: Evaluating Real Returns in a Changing Investment Landscape

In our previous post, we examined the value of investing in Portuguese farmland, highlighting its stability and potential for long-term growth. Now, in this second installment, we focus on the financial returns of investing specifically in organic nut orchards within our Low-Input Farming System. By presenting concrete financial scenarios, clarifying what is and isn’t included, and exploring emerging opportunities, we aim to give prospective investors a transparent and comprehensive view.

A Sobering Look at Conventional Investments

Many investors have grown disillusioned with traditional financial vehicles—be they pension funds, broad-market index portfolios, or even prime real estate in major global cities. High taxes, maintenance costs, and stagnant rental yields, coupled with the diminishing returns of traditional stock indices, leave many portfolios struggling to keep up with inflation. 

Although the S&P 500 has performed better than most indexes, its returns have largely been fueled by a handful of dominant tech companies. When we consider broader measures—ecological impact, social benefits, and long-term resilience—conventional investment avenues often fall short.

For too long, glossy brochures and optimistic forecasts have overshadowed the more sobering reality: many investors fail to achieve the financial freedom they hoped for, and promising spreadsheets often fail to reflect the real world’s complexity.

Agricultural Assets: A Grounded Alternative

This is where agricultural investments—particularly in organic nut orchards—offer a refreshing alternative. Instead of relying on speculative gains, we focus on productive land, regenerative soil management, and a strong global market for high-quality, sustainably produced food. Our Low Input Farming System aims to balance ecological stewardship with financial prudence.

While this example focuses on almonds, the metrics, and logic apply similarly to other high-value nut crops like walnuts or hazelnuts, each enjoying strong international demand and markets hungry for premium, organically produced goods.

Key Assumptions and Scenarios

To foster transparency, we provide each investing family with a detailed spreadsheet template. They can adjust yield assumptions, price expectations, and cost structures as they see fit. Below are two illustrative scenarios for almonds, noting that conventional models often assume peak yields of 2,500 kg/ha or more—significantly above our conservative estimates.

• Common Assumptions:

  • Land Rent: 5.7% of the land’s value per year. Using a €7,000/ha valuation, this equates to €400/ha/year.

  • Frost Losses: Total loss every 6 years, built into yield averages for conservative realism.

  • Almond Price: €6/kg for organic almonds, a cautious figure given historical swings (€4.80–€9.80/kg).

  • Operating Costs: Around €600/ha for harvesting and shelling.

  • Yield Curve: Yields begin at 600 kg/ha in Year 4 and peak in Year 7. For context, we consider a conservative peak yield of 1,000 kg/ha and an optimistic peak of 1,500 kg/ha. These are far below many conventional projections, which might assume 2,500 kg/ha or more.

Scenario 1: Conservative Returns

• Initial Investment: €8,000/ha (reflecting €16,000/ha with a 50% EU grant).

• Annual Running Costs: €2,000/ha plus €400/ha rent.

• Subsidies: Not included.

• Peak Yield: 1,000 kg/ha (conservative).

Under these conditions, the projected IRR over 25 years is about 10.7%. Introducing subsidies for a typical 15-hectare plantation improves the IRR to around 16.3% while eliminating rent (e.g., if you own the land outright) pushes the IRR above 18%.

Scenario 2: Optimistic Returns

• Initial Investment: €8,000/ha after grants.

• Annual Running Costs: €2,000/ha (no rent if you own the land).

• Subsidies: Included.

• Peak Yield: 1,500 kg/ha (optimistic).

Under these more favorable assumptions—higher yields, no rent, and subsidies—the IRR can exceed 23%. While this scenario is intentionally optimistic, it illustrates the significant potential when conditions align favorably.

Reflecting on the Scenarios

These two scenarios help demonstrate why interest in our projects has remained strong. Even the conservative scenario, which factors in rent and excludes subsidies, provides a respectable return over the long run—especially compared to many conventional portfolios. As we layer in subsidies, consider ownership structures (removing rent), and improve yields over time, the financial picture only gets brighter.

It’s worth remembering that these calculations are intentionally conservative. Many conventional orchard models assume much higher yields and actual market conditions or management improvements could push returns even higher. The point is not to oversell, but to show that even under modest assumptions, farmland investments can deliver stable, inflation-beating returns.

More Than Just Financial Returns

Our approach is rooted in regenerative agriculture—improving soil health, increasing biodiversity, and strengthening local communities. In a world where climate volatility, resource constraints, and social responsibility all factor into investment decisions, these “non-financial” returns matter. Over time, such resilience and positive impact can translate into tangible economic advantages, from brand differentiation to lower risk profiles.

Additional Revenue Streams & Financing Options

1. Carbon Credits: We have begun signing contracts for carbon credits. Though these start modestly, from around Year 7 onward they can form a meaningful income stream as the orchard matures and sequesters more carbon. Not yet included in our core IRR calculations, these credits add another layer of financial resilience.

2. Integrated Livestock (Sheep): We are introducing sheep into our orchards, managed by a dedicated team. Sheep offer natural vegetation control, improve soil fertility, and open an additional revenue stream (lambs). Crucially, they can also be utilized on land not currently set aside for biodiversity or orchard cultivation, maximizing overall land use efficiency. In the future, we will offer investors the option to integrate this livestock component, diversifying income sources and enhancing resilience.

3. Attractive Bank Financing: We have established a partnership with a local bank offering 40% financing over 15 years, with interest-only payments for the first three years. This structure aligns perfectly with the orchard’s income ramp-up, which starts around Year 4. Such financing reduces the upfront capital requirement, making the investment accessible to a broader range of investors and potentially improving IRR by leveraging less capital at the outset.

By stacking these enhancements—carbon credits, integrated livestock, and favorable financing—alongside the nut yields and subsidies, we create a diversified, robust system. Each addition bolsters economic stability, ecological health, and long-term value creation.

The Bottom Line

As traditional investment avenues struggle to deliver consistent, meaningful returns, agricultural ventures grounded in regenerative practices, solid market demand, and strategic financial planning stand apart. By starting with transparent, conservative scenarios and then adding layers of resilience and diversification, we offer investors a pathway to steady, responsible growth that aligns with both their financial and ethical values.

______________________

**Disclaimer: The scenarios and projections outlined above are for illustrative purposes only. Actual results may vary based on market conditions, climatic events, regulatory changes, and other unforeseen factors. Prospective investors are encouraged to conduct their due diligence or seek professional advice before making any investment decision.